Introduction
Linear Regression is a supervised learning algorithm used to model the relationship between a dependent variable (target) and one or more independent variables (predictors). It assumes a linear relationship between the variables and aims to find the best-fit line that minimizes the difference between actual and predicted values. There two types of Linear Regression:
- Simple Linear Regression (One predictor)
- Multiple Linear Regression (Multiple predictors)
Importance in Financial Analytics
Linear Regression is widely used in financial data analytics for:
- Predicting stock prices based on historical trend
- Risk assessment and portfolio optimization
- Credit scoring (assessing customer creditworthiness)
- Forecasting financial metrics such as revenue, profit, or expenses
- Understanding relationships between financial indicators (e.g., interest rates & investment growth)
Assumptions of Simple Linear Regression
- Linearity: The relationship between X and y is linear.
- Independence: Observations are independent of each other.
- Normality: The residuals are normally distributed.(Normality of error distribution)
- Homoscedasticity: The residuals have constant variance across all levels of X(Equal variance)
- No Multicollinearity: Only one predictor is used, so multicollinearity is not applicable.
- Linearity: The relationship between the independent and dependent variables is linear. This means that the change in the dependent variable is proportional to the change in the independent variable.
- Independence: The observations in the dataset are independent of each other. In other words, the value of one observation should not be influenced by the values of other observations.
- Homoscedasticity: The variance of the residuals (the differences between the observed and predicted values) is constant across all levels of the independent variable. This assumption ensures that the model is equally accurate for all values of the independent variable.
- Normality: The residuals are normally distributed. This means that the errors in the model follow a normal distribution with a mean of zero. This assumption is important for making accurate statistical inferences.
Assumptions of Linear Regression (Remember: LINE)
Assumption | Description |
L = Linear Relationship | The relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable must be linear. |
I = Independent Observations | Observations (errors) should not be correlated (especially in time-series data). |
N = Normal Distribution of Residuals | Residuals should follow a normal distribution. |
E = Equal Variance (Homoscedasticity) | The variance of residuals should remain constant across all levels of the independent variable. |
Data used for linear regression must follow a linear pattern. Among the patterns shown below, we can only apply linear regression to the first one, not the others..


Feature Selection & Engineering
- Handling categorical variables (One-Hot Encoding, Label Encoding)
- Creating interaction terms between features
- Scaling numerical variables (Standardization & Normalization)
- Detecting and treating multicollinearity (Variance Inflation Factor - VIF)
- Feature selection techniques:
- Backward Elimination
- Forward Selection
- Stepwise Regression
- Lasso & Ridge Regression (Regularization)
Simple Linear Regression (One Predictor)
Scikit-Learn Implementation
Key Parameters: LinearRegression()
Attributes of LinearRegression
Multiple Linear Regression (Multiple Predictors)
Scikit-Learn Implementation
Key Features of Multiple Linear Regression
Attributes of LinearRegression
(Multiple Regression)
Syntax for Multiple Linear Regression
Needless to apply scaling to Multiple Linear Regression
In simple terms, when you're using multiple linear regression, you don't have to scale your input data because the model will still make the same predictions no matter how the numbers are scaled. The regression coefficients will simply adjust to the differences in scale.
However, scaling your data can be helpful for a few reasons:
- Numerical Stability:
- Regularization:
- Optimization:
Scaling can make the math behind the regression more stable, especially if some numbers are much larger than others.
If you add techniques like Ridge or Lasso regression (which help prevent overfitting), scaling becomes very important. These methods penalize large coefficients, and scaling ensures that all features are treated fairly.
When using methods like gradient descent to find the best coefficients, scaling your data often helps the process run faster and more smoothly.
So, while it's not strictly necessary for basic multiple linear regression, scaling is often a good practice to improve stability, speed up training, and ensure fair treatment of all features.
Difference Between Prediction and Inference in Linear Regression (ML)
In machine learning, particularly in linear regression, we distinguish between prediction and inference:
- Prediction: Using the trained model to make future predictions based on new, unseen data.
- Inference: Understanding the relationships between the independent variables (features) and the dependent variable (target).
Case Study: House Price Prediction
Let’s consider a real estate company that wants to analyze house prices.
- Prediction Use Case: Given the size of a house, predict its price.
- Inference Use Case: Understanding how much the size of a house contributes to price increases.
Step 1: Load and Explore Data
We'll simulate a dataset where the house price depends on size (sqft) and number of bedrooms.
python
CopyEdit
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
# Generate synthetic dataset
np.random.seed(42)
size = np.random.randint(1000, 3000, 100) # House size in sqft
bedrooms = np.random.randint(1, 5, 100) # Number of bedrooms
price = 50000 + (size * 150) + (bedrooms * 10000) + np.random.normal(0, 10000, 100) # House price
# Create DataFrame
df = pd.DataFrame({'Size': size, 'Bedrooms': bedrooms, 'Price': price})
# Split into train and test sets
X = df[['Size', 'Bedrooms']]
y = df['Price']
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
Step 2: Train a Linear Regression Model
We will fit a linear regression model to predict house prices.
# Train model
model = LinearRegression()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Get model coefficients
print(f"Intercept: {model.intercept_}")
print(f"Coefficients: {dict(zip(X.columns, model.coef_))}")
Prediction Example
Now, let’s use the model to predict house prices for new houses.
python
CopyEdit
# New house details
new_house = pd.DataFrame({'Size': [2500, 1800], 'Bedrooms': [3, 2]})
# Predict house prices
predicted_prices = model.predict(new_house)
print(f"Predicted Prices: {predicted_prices}")
Key Insight:
- We are using the trained model to estimate the price of new, unseen houses.
- This is purely predictive since we do not analyze the relationship between features and the target.
Inference Example
To understand the impact of each feature on the house price, we use Statistical Inference.
python
CopyEdit
# Add constant term for intercept in statsmodels
X_train_sm = sm.add_constant(X_train)
# Fit the OLS regression model
ols_model = sm.OLS(y_train, X_train_sm).fit()
# Display summary statistics
print(ols_model.summary())
Key Insight:
- The p-values help determine if a variable significantly impacts price.
- The coefficients tell us how much price changes per unit increase in each feature.
- This is useful for making business decisions, such as whether adding a bedroom has a significant financial impact.
Final Takeaway
Aspect | Prediction | Inference |
Goal | Estimate price for new data | Understand feature impact |
Example | Predict price of a new house | How much does an extra bedroom add to price? |
Model Used | LinearRegression() | OLS from statsmodels |
Output | Price estimate | Statistical significance, coefficients |
Use Case | Forecasting | Business decisions |
Both prediction and inference are crucial in machine learning, but their use cases differ. Prediction is useful for forecasting, while inference helps explain and understand model relationships.
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: Price R-squared: 0.990
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.990
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 3945.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 Prob (F-statistic): 2.70e-78
Time: 17:25:32 Log-Likelihood: -838.07
No. Observations: 80 AIC: 1682.
Df Residuals: 77 BIC: 1689.
Df Model: 2
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 4.094e+04 4410.541 9.281 0.000 3.22e+04 4.97e+04
Size 153.4489 1.735 88.441 0.000 149.994 156.904
Bedrooms 1.112e+04 875.934 12.699 0.000 9378.960 1.29e+04
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 1.088 Durbin-Watson: 2.034
Prob(Omnibus): 0.581 Jarque-Bera (JB): 0.751
Skew: 0.234 Prob(JB): 0.687
Kurtosis: 3.080 Cond. No. 9.51e+03
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
[2] The condition number is large, 9.51e+03. This might indicate that there are
strong multicollinearity or other numerical problems.
Understanding OLS Regression Results in Financial Data Analysis
When working with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) Regression, interpreting the results correctly is crucial for making data-driven financial decisions. Let's break down each component of the regression output and understand its significance, along with how you can apply it as a financial data analyst.
1. Model Summary
This section provides the overall statistics for the model.
Component | Meaning | Application in Financial Analysis |
Dep. Variable | The dependent variable (target) being predicted. In this case, Price . | Helps confirm that we are modeling the correct financial metric (e.g., predicting stock prices, sales, or revenue). |
Model | The type of regression used. Here, it is OLS (Ordinary Least Squares). | Confirms we are using standard linear regression for relationship analysis. |
Method | Least Squares , meaning the model minimizes the sum of squared residuals. | Ensures we are using the best-fitting line to minimize prediction errors. |
Date & Time | When the model was run. | Useful for auditing and tracking model performance over time. |
No. Observations | The number of data points used (80). | Ensures we have enough data for reliable results. |
Df Model | Degrees of freedom for the independent variables (2). | Shows how many predictors (features) were included. |
Df Residuals | Degrees of freedom for errors (80 - 2 - 1 = 77). | Helps assess the model complexity. |
Covariance Type | nonrobust , meaning standard error calculations assume no heteroskedasticity (constant variance of errors). | In financial modeling, if errors are heteroskedastic (variance changes over time), robust standard errors should be used. |
2. Model Performance Metrics
These metrics assess the goodness of fit of the model.
Metric | Meaning | Application in Financial Analysis |
R-squared (0.990) | Proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the model. (Ranges from 0 to 1) | High R² (0.99) means that Size and Bedrooms explain 99% of the variation in house prices, which is an excellent fit. |
Adj. R-squared (0.990) | Adjusted for the number of predictors, prevents overfitting. | If more variables were added but didn’t improve the model, this would decrease. Used when comparing multiple regression models. |
F-statistic (3945) | Tests whether at least one independent variable is statistically significant. | A very high value means the independent variables collectively explain price variations well. |
Prob (F-statistic) (2.70e-78) | p-value for the F-test. Small values (< 0.05) indicate the model is statistically significant. | A near-zero value confirms that at least one predictor significantly affects house prices. |
3. Regression Coefficients
These values represent the impact of each predictor on the dependent variable.
Parameter | Coefficient ( coef ) | Meaning | Financial Data Application |
Intercept ( const = 4.094e+04 ) | 40,940 | The base price of a house when Size and Bedrooms are both zero. | In financial modeling, the intercept is the fixed base cost or base value of an asset or investment. |
Size ( 153.4489 ) | 153.45 | For every 1 square foot increase, price increases by $153.45. | Helps in evaluating marginal effects—useful in investment risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis. |
Bedrooms ( 1.112e+04 = 11,120 ) | 11,120 | Adding an extra bedroom increases price by $11,120. | Can guide pricing strategies in real estate investment decisions. |
4. Statistical Significance of Coefficients
These help us determine which variables significantly impact price.
Statistic | Meaning | Financial Application |
Standard Error ( std err ) | Measures the uncertainty in the estimated coefficients. | Lower values indicate more reliable estimates. |
t-statistic ( t ) | Measures how much the coefficient differs from zero (higher is better). | Large absolute values (> 2) suggest strong statistical significance. |
**P> | t | (p-value)** |
Confidence Interval [0.025, 0.975] | The range in which the true coefficient likely falls, with 95% certainty. | For Bedrooms , we are 95% confident that the effect is between $9,378.96 and $12,900. |
5. Model Diagnostics
These tests validate model assumptions.
Metric | Meaning | Financial Application |
Omnibus ( 1.088 ) | Tests normality of residuals. If close to 0, residuals are normally distributed. | Since Prob(Omnibus) = 0.581 > 0.05, residuals follow a normal distribution—good for accurate predictions. |
Durbin-Watson ( 2.034 ) | Tests autocorrelation in residuals (ranges from 0 to 4, where 2 is ideal). | Close to 2, meaning no autocorrelation—good for time series financial data. |
Jarque-Bera (JB) ( 0.751 ) | Another normality test (like Omnibus). If Prob(JB) > 0.05, normality assumption holds. | Since 0.687 > 0.05, residuals are normally distributed, which is required for hypothesis testing. |
Kurtosis ( 3.080 ) | Measures peakedness of residual distribution. Normal distribution has a kurtosis of 3. | Since 3.08 ≈ 3, residuals are normally distributed, making predictions more reliable. |
Condition Number ( 9.51e+03 ) | Measures multicollinearity (high values mean severe correlation issues). | If > 30 , multicollinearity is a concern. Here, 9.51e+03 is large, suggesting that Size and Bedrooms may be correlated, which can distort coefficients. |
How to Apply These Insights as a Financial Data Analyst
- Investment Decision-Making: Use regression analysis to predict stock prices, revenue, sales forecasts, and investment returns.
- Risk Assessment: Identify which factors (e.g., interest rates, GDP) significantly impact financial markets.
- Pricing Strategy: Optimize real estate pricing, loan pricing, or insurance premiums using coefficient interpretations.
- Forecasting: Develop predictive models for sales, demand, or expenses based on historical data.
- Multicollinearity Handling: If the condition number is too high, use variance inflation factor (VIF) or principal component analysis (PCA) to remove redundancy.
- Model Validation: Ensure assumptions like normality, no autocorrelation, and significant predictors hold before making financial decisions.
Default Values & How to Modify Them
Parameter | Default | How to Modify |
Covariance Type | nonrobust | Use HC0 , HC1 , etc., for heteroskedasticity-robust errors (ols_model.get_robustcov_results() ). |
Significance Level | 0.05 (5%) | Can be changed based on industry norms (e.g., 0.01 for stricter financial models). |
Confidence Interval | 95% | Modify with ols_model.conf_int(alpha=0.01) for 99% confidence intervals. |
Durbin-Watson Threshold | ≈ 2 is ideal | If << 2 or >> 2 , consider adding lag terms or using ARIMA models. |
Final Thoughts
Understanding OLS regression output is essential for making data-driven financial decisions. As a financial data analyst, mastering these metrics allows you to:
- Build accurate predictive models.
- Interpret key drivers of financial trends.
- Ensure model validity for business applications.
Would you like me to demonstrate how to apply this on real financial data (e.g., stock prices or sales forecasting)? 🚀
You said:
Do I need to calculate inference if I use regression or polynomial to check
ChatGPT said:
Do You Need Inference When Using Regression or Polynomial Regression?
It depends on your goal:
- If your goal is prediction, you don’t necessarily need inference.
- Example: Forecasting future sales or stock prices using polynomial regression.
- You focus on making accurate predictions, not understanding relationships.
- If your goal is understanding the relationships between variables (causation/inference), then you must perform inference.
- Example: Evaluating how much sales increase when marketing spend increases.
- You analyze coefficients, confidence intervals, and significance (p-values, F-tests).
Regression Types and When to Use Inference
Model Type | Used for Prediction? | Used for Inference? | Example Use Case |
Linear Regression | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | Predict sales & understand impact of ad spend |
Polynomial Regression | ✅ Yes | ❌ No (usually) | Predict stock prices (not for causal relationships) |
Logistic Regression | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | Predict customer churn & understand risk factors |
Decision Trees | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | Predict fraud but no clear coefficient analysis |
Neural Networks | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | High accuracy for predictions, but not interpretable |
Case Study: When Inference is NOT Needed
Let's say we are predicting house prices using polynomial regression.
1. Build a Polynomial Regression Model (Only for Prediction)
python
CopyEdit
from sklearn.preprocessing import PolynomialFeatures
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
import numpy as np
# Generate synthetic data
np.random.seed(42)
X = np.random.randint(1000, 3000, 100).reshape(-1, 1) # House size
y = 50000 + (X.flatten()**2 * 0.00005) + np.random.normal(0, 5000, 100) # Price
# Train polynomial regression model
poly_model = make_pipeline(PolynomialFeatures(degree=2), LinearRegression())
poly_model.fit(X, y)
# Predict for a new house
new_house = np.array([[2500]])
predicted_price = poly_model.predict(new_house)
print(f"Predicted Price: {predicted_price}")
Why We Skip Inference?
- Polynomial regression coefficients are not easily interpretable.
- We don't care about the impact of each variable; we only care about the prediction.
Case Study: When Inference is Needed
Now, let's check if size significantly impacts house prices.
2. Perform Inference Using OLS
python
CopyEdit
import statsmodels.api as sm
# Add constant term for intercept
X_sm = sm.add_constant(X)
# Fit an OLS model
ols_model = sm.OLS(y, X_sm).fit()
# Display summary
print(ols_model.summary())
Why We Use Inference Here?
- We check p-values to confirm if
Size
significantly affectsPrice
. - We analyze the coefficients to quantify the effect.
Key Takeaways
Scenario | Use Inference? | Why? |
Predicting sales using linear regression | ❌ No | We only care about forecasting, not relationships. |
Analyzing effect of ad spend on revenue | ✅ Yes | We need to check if ad spend is significant. |
Predicting stock prices using polynomial regression | ❌ No | Predictions matter, not the interpretation of coefficients. |
Checking how interest rates impact loan defaults | ✅ Yes | We want to verify causal relationships. |
If your focus is on predictions only, you don’t need inference. But if you want to explain relationships, inference is essential. 🚀
Here’s a detailed comparison table that breaks down Prediction vs. Inference under Machine Learning (ML) and Econometrics, highlighting both overlaps and distinctions:
Aspect | Machine Learning: Prediction | Econometrics: Inference | Overlap | Difference |
Primary Goal | Accurately predict future or unseen outcomes using algorithms | Understand relationships, causality, and parameter significance in a model | Both use data to learn patterns | ML focuses on accuracy; econometrics focuses on explanation and causality |
Typical Question | "Given new data, what will the outcome be?" | "Does X cause Y? How strong is the relationship?" | May use same variables or dataset | ML may ignore causality; econometrics insists on it |
Model Evaluation | Uses metrics like accuracy, RMSE, AUC, etc. | Uses statistical tests: t-tests, p-values, confidence intervals | Both validate models | Different validation goals and metrics |
Assumptions | Few assumptions (e.g., in random forests, XGBoost) | Heavy reliance on assumptions (e.g., linearity, normality, homoscedasticity, no endogeneity) | Linear regression is used in both | ML uses models even when assumptions are violated |
Interpretability | Not always interpretable (black-box models common, e.g., neural nets) | Highly interpretable; coefficients have economic meaning | Interpretable ML models exist (e.g., decision trees, linear models) | Econometrics mandates interpretability; ML trades it off for predictive power sometimes |
Data Requirements | Can handle high-dimensional data, often needs large datasets | Often works with smaller datasets, focused on sampling quality | Both prefer clean, relevant, and unbiased data | ML thrives on big data; econometrics is careful with overfitting and sample size implications |
Handling of Overfitting | Uses cross-validation, regularization (Lasso, Ridge), ensembling | Tries to avoid overfitting through theory-based model specification | Both aim to generalize well | ML handles overfitting empirically; econometrics relies on theory and specification tests |
Causal Inference | Not the focus (correlation may suffice for prediction) | Central to analysis; uses IVs, DiD, RDD, etc. | Causal ML exists (e.g., Causal Forests, DoWhy) | Econometrics built for causality; ML requires additional tools and care |
Use of Theory | Data-driven; models often developed empirically | Theory-driven; models specified based on economic theory | Theory-aware models exist in both | Econometrics grounded in domain knowledge; ML can be agnostic |
Common Tools | scikit-learn, XGBoost, TensorFlow, PyTorch | STATA, R (with packages like lm , plm ), Python (statsmodels, linearmodels) | Python and R used in both | ML uses cutting-edge libraries; econometrics relies on robust statistical packages |
Summary:
- Prediction (ML): Prioritizes what happens — future outcomes, recommendations, classifications.
- Inference (Econometrics): Focuses on why it happens — significance, causality, structural understanding.
They overlap in using models like linear regression and need for clean data, but they diverge in goals, assumptions, tools, and interpretation.
Would you like this formatted as a downloadable table or integrated into a study note format?